
Stormwater and trash admin fees were the single most common issue in a recent Billee portfolio audit, showing up at four of five properties reviewed, more often than broken meters or a stale utility cap. At two Houston properties where fee corrections were the entire fix, no broken meters, no cap, correcting trash and stormwater admin fees as small as $1.15 to $3.00 per unit per month recovered $5,300 and $24,600 a year. These are not dramatic numbers property by property. Multiplied across a portfolio, they are the kind of gap that hides in plain sight for years.
A stormwater admin fee is a municipal charge, usually billed on a property's impervious surface area rather than water usage, that funds local drainage infrastructure. Because it is assessed separately from the water and sewer bill and does not move with metered consumption, it does not get caught by the same review that typically checks usage-based billing. A fee that was never added, or one added years ago and never revisited, quietly becomes lost recovery that nothing in a normal billing workflow flags on its own.
A stormwater fee is not part of the water bill. It is a separate municipal charge, assessed on a property's impervious surface, roofs, driveways, parking lots, and it is typically invoiced to the property owner directly rather than flowing through the same channel as metered water and sewer usage. That distinction matters operationally: a team that carefully reviews metered utility bills for accuracy can still miss a stormwater fee entirely, because it was never part of that review in the first place.
Trash admin fees have a similar blind spot. They are often set once, at a flat dollar amount, and then left alone the same way a utility cap gets left alone, reviewed rarely if ever after the initial setup.
That is exactly the pattern a recent Billee audit of a 36-property, roughly 10,000-unit Texas portfolio found. Trash and stormwater fee issues turned up at four of the five properties audited in that pass, more properties than had broken meters. At two of those properties, correcting the fees was the entire fix required, and it still recovered five figures a year each.
Stormwater fees exist because developed land changes how rain moves. Roofs, driveways, and parking lots prevent water from soaking into the ground, creating runoff that a municipality has to manage through pipes, detention ponds, and street sweeping, infrastructure that costs money to maintain. Many municipalities fund that maintenance through a dedicated stormwater utility fee rather than folding it into the general water bill, a structure the Clean Water Act's MS4 permit program has pushed many cities toward over the past several decades.
More than 2,200 of these utilities now exist nationally, and the number has been rising for years. Because the fee is based on a property's impervious surface area rather than metered consumption, it does not appear on the same bill as water usage, is not triggered by any change in resident behavior, and does not move when usage does. A property team reviewing utility bills for unusual consumption patterns has no reason to notice a stormwater line item that was never added, or one that has not changed in years, because nothing about it looks like a billing error in the way a usage spike does.
Trash admin fees miss for a related but simpler reason: they are usually a flat number set once at lease-up or acquisition, with no mechanism that prompts anyone to check whether it still reflects the actual hauling cost.
A few checks are worth running property by property:
| Property (Houston, TX) | Issue found | Fee correction | Annual recovery |
|---|---|---|---|
| Example B | Incorrect trash fee, missing stormwater fee | Trash $2.95 to $3.00; added $1.15 stormwater | $5,300/year |
| Example C | Incorrect trash fee, missing stormwater fee | Trash $1.15 to $3.00; phased in $3.00 stormwater | $24,600/year |
Whether a new or corrected fee can be passed through to residents depends on what the existing lease already allows. The broader the operating-expense or utility pass-through language in the lease, the more likely a fee correction fits within it; a narrower lease may require the change to wait for renewal.
That is exactly the pattern in the case study above: at properties where a fee needed to be added rather than simply corrected, the new charge was phased in with lease renewals rather than applied mid-term. Reviewing the lease language first, rather than assuming a fee can be added immediately, avoids turning a legitimate correction into a resident dispute.
The annual figures above are the value of correcting the fee going forward, not necessarily the size of a one-time recovery for years the fee was missing. In Texas, backbilling a resident for a missed or stale fee, which is not a meter error, is capped at the previous six months of bills, the same rule that limits recovery on a stale utility cap. A trash or stormwater fee that has been missing for years is not going to yield years of backdated recovery. It yields, at most, a few months of catch-up plus the full corrected rate every year after that.
That corrected rate, recurring every year, is still the real prize. It is just a different number than the total years of history the fee was missing, and it is worth being precise about which one a portfolio is actually counting on.
Correcting a missing or stale fee raises NOI permanently, and NOI is the number buyers and lenders use to price the property. Applying a hypothetical 6% cap rate, a common reference point for stabilized multifamily assets, to the $24,600 recovered annually at the larger of the two fee-only examples above works out to roughly $410,000 in added property value. Cap rates vary by market and asset condition, so this is illustrative rather than a guaranteed appraisal outcome, but it shows why a fee this small is still worth finding: a corrected line item that looks minor on a monthly statement is worth a multiple of itself the moment the property is valued.
One property with one suspected fee gap is manageable in-house: confirm the municipality's current stormwater rate, check the trash hauler's current charge, compare both against what residents are actually billed, and correct at renewal if the lease requires it.
Checking every property in a portfolio for the same gap, and confirming which fee type is missing where, is the harder, ongoing problem. That is a systematic review across every property and every municipality's current rate, not a one-time check, since a fee correct today can still go stale again in a few years the same way a utility cap does.
Billee's Regulatory & Compliance service audits trash and stormwater admin fees against current municipal rates and hauler contracts, property by property, and checks the backbilling rules that apply before promising a recovery number that is not actually collectible. It's how the $5,300 and $24,600 recoveries above surfaced, two fixes among $220,500 recovered across five properties in a single pass of a 36-property Texas portfolio.
Billee's account team then tracks each corrected fee on the portfolio dashboard, so a fee that is right today does not quietly go stale again the way the ones in this audit did.
A municipal charge, usually based on a property's impervious surface area rather than water usage, that funds local drainage infrastructure like pipes and detention ponds.
They are billed separately from the water and sewer bill and do not move with metered consumption, so a usage-focused billing review has no reason to catch one that is missing or stale.
It depends on the size of the gap and the property's unit count. In one audited case, correcting fees of $1.15 to $3.00 per unit per month recovered $5,300 and $24,600 a year at two properties.
It depends on the lease's pass-through language. A broad operating-expense clause may already allow it; a narrower lease typically requires phasing the fee in at renewal.
Usually not in full. In Texas, for example, backbilling for this kind of undercharge is capped at the previous six months of bills, so the corrected go-forward rate is typically the realistic recovery.
No. A stormwater fee is a separate municipal charge tied to impervious surface area. A utility cap and RUBS are both ways of billing metered utility usage, which is a different category of charge entirely.
More than 2,200 have been enacted across U.S. municipalities, and the total has been growing for years, per the Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey.
Yes. A corrected fee raises recurring NOI, and NOI drives the property's valuation at sale or refinance, the same relationship that applies to any other corrected billing line item.
Billee's Regulatory & Compliance service audits trash and stormwater admin fees against current municipal and hauler rates, property by property, the same process that surfaced the fee gaps in Billee's RET LP portfolio audit.
If trash or stormwater admin fees haven't been checked against current municipal rates in a while, it's worth finding out what's missing. Talk to the team.


